The author implies that the learning the changes made in the construction of Perl 6 will be a large detriment. In ten years, there will be much more crufty code written in this regrettable language, and departures that broke backward-compatability would cause even more whining.Ĥ. The author doesn’t indicate why Perl 5 makes Perl 6 superfluous, nor why in ten years it would be more suitable. The author insists that because Perl 5 is “good enough” that Perl 6 is unnecessary, but could nevertheless be an adequate evolution of Perl in a period of ten years. Ponie (which the author mentions) is already posed to implement Perl 5 for Parrot permitting interoperability between Perl 6 and Perl 5.ģ. A lot of people do not tend to even understand Perl 5 very thoroughly, but that doesn’t seem to impede its progress.Ģ. The author doesn’t understand the contents of the Apocolypse documents, and concludes that this makes Perl 6 too complex because others will understand them even less.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |